Journal Home
Search for

Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages 389-396 (November 2008)


View previous. 5 of 9 View next.

Supporting student nurses on placement in nursing homes: The challenges for the link-tutor role

Joanna L. KerridgeCorresponding Author Informationemail addressemail address

Accepted 16 March 2008. published online 06 May 2008.

Summary 

Practice-based learning has always been a key feature of nursing education, and the quality of student learning is heavily influenced by the quality of the clinical experience. In addition, with an ageing population, nurses will need to better develop the particular clinical skills related to meeting the needs of older people in diverse settings. Increasingly, health care faculties in universities are turning to nursing homes to provide clinical placements for student nurses. This paper examines the literature related to the benefits and challenges of using nursing homes as placement areas for student nurses, with particular reference to the challenges that nursing home placements present for link tutors. The paper concludes with a proposal for a model for the link-tutor role in nursing homes.

Article Outline

Summary

Introduction

Literature review

Work-based learning

The role of the link tutor

The role and value of nursing homes as clinical placements

Nursing homes as suitable work-based placements for student nurses

Discussion of the significant findings from the literature

A proposed model for the link-tutor role in nursing home settings

LTs work with students on placement in nursing homes

LTs work with nursing home staff

The LT as a bridge between the nursing home and the university

Conclusion

References

Copyright

Introduction 

return to Article Outline

Practice/work-based learning has always been a key feature of nursing education. However, the quality of student learning is heavily influenced by the quality of the clinical experience (Koh, 2002). The impact of this on patient care has led the Government to place considerable emphasis on effective partnerships between service and education (Department of Health, 2000, Gallagher and Holland, 2004). Nurse lecturers have an important role to play in working collaboratively with clinical nurses to enhance student learning. In addition, collaborative bridges can be built between the university and the practice area to work together to encourage the development of learning organisations in order to improve clinical outcomes for patients (Davies and Nutley, 2000). This has particular relevance for nursing homes, where problems of a static work–force, and a lack of professional development opportunities, can lead to stagnation on the part of staff (Wade and Skinner, 2001).

The role of the link tutor (LT) fits within this concept of partnership working, and the development of standards to support learning and assessment in practice (Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2004a, Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2007) provides a framework to address concerns about the quality of these issues for students during their placements. By definition, a link tutor is a nurse lecturer from the university who also takes responsibility for working closely with a defined clinical area to support students and clinically-based mentors in that area.

With an increasing older population, nurses will need to develop the particular clinical skills related to meeting the needs of older people in diverse settings. Increasingly, health care faculties in universities are forming links with nursing homes for clinical placements for student nurses. This paper explores, with reference to the literature, the particular challenges for the LT role in supporting students on placement in nursing homes, and proposes a new model for this role.

Literature review 

return to Article Outline

The literature that is relevant to this article comes from four sources: work-based learning, the role of the link tutor (LT) in general, the role and value of practice placements in nursing homes, and issues surrounding the use of nursing homes as suitable work-based placements for student nurses.

Work-based learning 

Gallagher and Holland (2004) define work-based learning as the bringing together of self-knowledge, expertise in the work place, and formal knowledge. It is a concept which encourages reflection, values learning opportunities in practice, and promotes the development of professional knowledge. Work-based learning promotes learning through experience, and experiential learning is based on the premise that learning gained through experience is more meaningful to the learner (Kolb, 1984), and ensures a high degree of relevance. Guiding nursing students to reflect on, and use, their experiences to help them contextualise and conceptualise new information, is important in order for them to understand, learn and develop as effective practitioners (Dix and Hughes, 2004).

The importance of work-based experience, in the development of professional expertise, has refocused the role of the teacher from transmitter of knowledge to that of facilitator, drawing on the experiences of the learner (Benner, 1984, Schon, 1987, Duraghee, 1998, Scanlan et al., 2002). This is particularly important for the role of the link tutor in clinical learning.

In the UK, although the importance of work-based learning in the education and training of student nurses has been emphasised nationally (Department of Health, 1999, English National Board/DoH, 2001), providing appropriate work-based learning placements remains a challenge, as it does for nursing in many countries of the world. In the USA, the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) places a high priority on student nurses gaining clinical work-based experience across the lifespan (NCSBN, 2005), however, Li (2007) highlights that there is a lack of both mentors and clinical placement sites for student nurses in the USA, leading to the need to find new ways of providing clinical experiences for students.

The role of the link tutor 

Little significant literature is available on the specific role of the link tutor in nursing homes, however, literature related to the generic role of the link tutor can be applied. In the USA, the NCSBN (2005) suggest that prelicensure nursing students should be supervised, in clinical placements, by a suitably qualified faculty member, whose role is that of facilitation of learning and promoting reflection. In the UK, Gerrish (1992) identified key roles for lecturers in practice settings, which can serve as a guide for the LT role in nursing homes. Firstly, LTs should provide educational support for the clinical staff to enable them to support the students. Secondly, they should support the students and facilitate their work-based learning, particularly the integration of theory and clinical practice. Finally, the lecturer has a responsibility to ensure good practice through keeping themselves up-dated, being a resource for the practice area, and encouraging a critical approach to practice. However, in a study in Sweden, Fagerberg et al. (2000) found that clinical teachers in elderly care were seldom seen as people who inspired students to want to work in the speciality, and this will have a bearing on the way the role of the link tutor in nursing homes is conceptualised.

The role and value of nursing homes as clinical placements 

An increase in the number of student nurses at the end of the last decade (DoH, 1999) resulted in an increased need for high quality placements for them to gain practical skills (United Kingdom Central Council, 1999). At the same time, the shift in healthcare, away from long stay hospital care to a more acute, short stay model, led to the increased use of nursing homes to meet this demand. This scenario is not confined to the UK, and the literature indicates that the shortage of hospital-based placement areas is a global issue for nursing education, and is leading to an international increase in the use of nursing homes for clinical placements (Chilvers and Jones, 1997, Li, 2007).

Davies et al. (2002) highlight the importance for nurses, working in this kind of environment, to feel valued in creating positive learning environments for students, particularly as they are often perceived as only providing basic care, with no requirement to develop any specialist skills (Lumley et al., 2000, Richardson et al., 2001, Banning et al., 2006). Wade and Skinner (2001) suggest that the ability of the staff to recognise their work as skilled and expert will influence their ability to convey this to the students, which in turn will influence the students’ perceptions of the care delivered.

Philipose et al. (1991) undertook a review of the evolution of gerontological education in nursing, in Greece, and cites the value of nursing students undertaking placements in a variety of elderly care settings. A decade later, Kotzabassaki et al. (2006) examined the perceptions of student nurses in Greece, about caring for older people, and found that nursing education, including placements in elderly care facilities, was effective in preparing them to give better care. Similar findings were identified in a more recent Australian study (Abbey et al., 2006). This study also showed that if certain negative elements of a nursing home placement were addressed then the experience could lead to more positive perceptions of elderly care nursing as a career. In the USA, Williams et al. (2006) described the positive impact on students’ attitudes, and career choices, of integrating elderly care experience into the final year of placements.

The value of a nursing home placement for students’ is in the opportunity to participate in person-centred holistic care, where they can understand the transitions people make at different stages of their lives (Rogan and Wyllie, 2003). According to Wade and Skinner (2001) looking after different groups of people in different settings makes a whole nurse; nursing home placements enable students to move towards this by caring for older people, and meeting their needs in a different context of care.

Nursing homes as suitable work-based placements for student nurses 

return to Article Outline

In the UK, in order to take student nurses on placement, the nursing homes have to meet the NMC criteria for a learning environment (NMC, 2004b). The LT, in collaboration with nursing home staff, completes the educational audit to assess whether the criteria have been met, but the process is also an effective way of acknowledging areas of good practice, whilst at the same time identifying areas for development.

Prior to placement, students often have negative views about nursing homes and caring for older people (Philipose et al., 1991, Buckwater et al., 1993, Happell, 1999, Happell, 2002), and fail to recognise the learning opportunities available to them. Many students have previously worked in similar settings as healthcare assistants and do not view them as learning environments (Wade and Skinner, 2001, Davies et al., 2002, Banning et al., 2006). However, Richardson et al. (2001) suggest that nursing homes can actually provide a supportive environment with fewer pressures on clinical staff, giving time to build relationships with students, and allowing the students to build relationships with patients. This has also been found to be particularly beneficial in developing fundamental nursing skills, as well as positive attitudes to older people (Richardson et al., 2001). Wade and Skinner, 2001, Storey and Adams, 2002, Banning et al., 2006 all report a considerable shift in the students’ perceptions following positive experiences during nursing home placement, and there is general acknowledgement of the opportunities available to them. Wade and Skinner, 2001, Storey and Adams, 2002 also identify the notion of nursing homes being “nurse-led”, as an important concept for students to explore.

The demands placed on clinical staff by students should not be underestimated. Hutchings et al. (2005) identifies the pressure of competing priorities for clinical staff trying to meet the needs of both patients and students; something which, Lumley et al. (2000) suggest, is particularly relevant for staff in the commercial world of private-sector nursing home provision, where financial considerations can affect both the quantity and quality of the staff mentoring the students. Storey and Adams (2002) found that when nursing homes face a daily struggle to maintain financial viability, and recruit staff of the appropriate calibre, resources for student placements can be limited. The model for the LT in the nursing home (see Fig. 2) can help to overcome these challenges and make the private-sector nursing home a rich source of elderly care work-based experience.

Discussion of the significant findings from the literature 

return to Article Outline

There is little evidence that the opportunities for learning available in the nursing home are significantly different or more superior to learning opportunities in hospital or community-based elderly care units. Nursing homes as placement areas for student nurses are not without their challenges, nor are they intended to replace other practice-based learning environments for students, however, they do provide a potentially rich additional source of practice learning that should be explored. The link tutor in the nursing home is ideally placed to undertake this challenge.

Some of the key issues identified in the literature that will have a bearing on a new role for link tutors in nursing homes are summarised in Fig. 1.


View full-size image.

Figure 1. Significant findings from the literature for the LT role.


With this literature in mind, a new model for the role of the link tutor in nursing homes is proposed.

A proposed model for the link-tutor role in nursing home settings 

return to Article Outline

From the literature, a model for the role of the link tutor in a nursing home setting begins to emerge. Although similar to the link-tutor role in other settings, additional aspects of the role will be determined by the unique features of the nursing home.

The model for the LT role in the nursing home is divided into three areas of work: working with students; working with nursing home staff; acting as a bridge between the nursing home and university.

LTs work with students on placement in nursing homes 

The work of the LT with students involves a range of activities to make Gallager and Holland’s (2004) definition of work-based learning a reality. Students have identified that the provision of learning and personal support, from both their LT and mentor, is key to the success of their placement (Lumley et al., 2000, Wade and Skinner, 2001). The need for emotional support has also been identified, as the students may be exposed, for the first time, to a patient whose condition is deteriorating, and who may be dying. Wade and Skinner (2001) suggest that students may also need the support of the LT to confidently challenge practice or raise issues of concern. Students report the fear of repercussions whilst still on placement as the main barrier to challenging practice (Wade and Skinner, 2001).

A second activity for the LT is to promote a positive attitude. Through the use of guided reflection, the LT can help students to process their nurse-led care experiences, and challenge any negative attitudes and preconceptions about older people and nursing home care (Duraghee, 1998). Burton (2000) suggests that if reflection is seen as a part of a developmental cycle, whereby new knowledge is integrated with old, then changes in practice are more likely to occur.

Finally, LTs can participate in teaching sessions on aspects of care related to older people in nursing homes. Clinical competence and credibility, as well as teaching skills, are identified as key requirements for staff in a clinical teaching role (Williamson and Webb, 2001, Ramage, 2004). Wade and Skinner, 2001, Rogan and Wyllie, 2003 suggest that the ability of students to recognise the skills and expertise required to provide expert care in a nursing home setting, is often dependant on having a knowledgeable LT, and specialist knowledge is needed in order to support the students in this type of placement. This can be facilitated most effectively if the LT allocated to a nursing home has some previous clinical experience and expertise in this field (Clifford, 1999, Griscti et al., 2005).

LTs work with nursing home staff 

One key activity for LTs is undertaking the educational audit of the nursing home environment prior to students taking up their placements. Such an educational audit is a collaborative activity between the LT and nursing home staff, and requires extensive preparation and considerable commitment from both.

Richardson et al. (2001) report that having students in their workplace makes nursing home staff question their own practice, and motivates them to develop their own professional knowledge and skills. This may be of particular importance in this setting as there is some evidence that the majority of nurses working in nursing homes are not engaged in any form of continuing professional education, and that it is not given the same priority as it receives within the NHS (Davies and Nutley, 2000, Davies et al., 2002). The reasons for this are varied and not always easily resolved; staff may have difficulty accessing development opportunities; the cost to their employer may be prohibitive; isolation from other colleagues prevents sharing of good practice, and terms and conditions of employment often do not consider this aspect of the nurse’s role. Storey and Adams (2002) also report that not all registered nurses enjoy the challenge that mentoring students provides, and although this may be linked to pressures of work, it may also be a by-product of their own feelings of inadequacy due to a lack of professional development opportunities. Providing learning resources for clinical staff enables the nursing home to have access to up-to-date resources for challenging (and changing) their own practice.

Supporting staff is a key responsibility of the LT in the nursing home setting (Gerrish, 1992), and Duffy et al. (2000) identify the need for this support to be provided in the clinical placement rather than a remote classroom. Although the nature of this support is unclear, other than acting as mentor to the mentors, it is clearly evaluated as an important factor in the learning experience of both the students and their mentors (Duffy et al., 2000, Wade and Skinner, 2001), and there seems to be a direct correlation between good mentor support from the LT, and good student support from their placement mentor. Williamson and Webb, 2001, Hutchings et al., 2005 also report the value that managers place on the supportive role of the LT, suggesting that it has a positive effect upon the way in which students are perceived by all staff.

Supporting the staff in meeting the requirements of the practice assessment may be a particular challenge for the LT in a nursing home setting, as staff in this environment may have little experience of pre-registration nursing assessment (Richardson et al., 2001). Quinn (2000) warns that training, preparation and support for staff in this important role are crucial, and Billet (2004) suggests that the more often staff mentor or assess students the more proficient they will become.

Inadequate preparation for this role is cited as a problem for both students and placement (Richardson et al., 2001, Wade and Skinner, 2001, Davies et al., 2002), but mentor updates, which include the dissemination of guidelines for mentors (NMC, 2004c), give clear standards to be achieved, and can be delivered in the clinical setting by the LT.

The LT as a bridge between the nursing home and the university 

The LT gives the nursing home a voice within the university, and provides a conduit for improved channels of communication. Williamson and Webb (2001) suggest that there is much for nursing home staff to value, in having close ties to a university, not least the opportunity for staff to engage in both continuing professional development and collaborative practice development. In-house learning experiences such as workshops, and work related conferences, can contribute to the support of nursing home staff, and mentor training and updates are ways in which the LT and University can provide the most up-to-date guidance available. A collaborative relationship also gives nursing home staff the opportunity to participate in university-based activities such as curriculum planning groups, journal clubs, research projects and assessment boards, which are beneficial to both parties.

In summary, Fig. 2 shows the model of the role of the LT in the nursing home setting.


View full-size image.

Figure 2. A model for the link-tutor role in nursing homes.


Conclusion 

return to Article Outline

The literature shows that nursing homes provide skilled and complex care, offering students different experiences in a nurse-led setting, and there is evidence that imaginative and well-supported clinical placements in nursing homes can have a positive impact on the attitudes of nursing students (Storey and Adams, 2002).

Constructive engagement with today’s students may have a positive impact on nursing home recruitment in the future; at the very least students who have successful experiences in nursing homes can play a positive role in raising the profile of nursing home care. In addition, undertaking placements in a nursing home enables the students to experience how nurse-led units function. It can also lead to an improvement in the education and knowledge-base of nursing home staff through engagement with students, and subsequently to the improvement of the quality of care for residents. Superimposed on this is the contribution made by a new model for the link-tutor role.

The presence of students supports the notion of a nursing home as a learning environment, but it is essential that students should not be exposed to poor practice or low standards as this could re-enforce negative images of nursing homes. Students can be seen as a dynamic force, which can help prevent stagnation in a static work–force (Wade and Skinner, 2001). The key is in the preparation of both staff and students, and the support they each receive. Both mentors and students have highlighted the need for more effective communication between placement areas and academic staff, and LT’s are ideally placed to address this. The context of the students’ clinical experience can impact on their learning; it must be part of the role of the LT to ensure that this is a positive not negative impact, and working in partnership with the workplace would seem to be the best way of achieving this. The model for the role of the LT in the nursing home setting, offers a way of supporting students and enhancing their work-based learning, supporting nursing home staff to create and maintain a good educational environment, and build bridges between the university and the nursing home.

References 

return to Article Outline

Abbey et al., 2006. 1.Abbey J, Abbey B, Bridges P, Elder R, Lemcke P, Liddle J, et al. Clinical placements in residential aged care facilities: the impact on nursing students’ perceptions of aged care and the effect on career plans. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2006;23:14–19. MEDLINE

Banning et al., 2006. 2.Banning M, Hill Y, Rawlings S. Student learning in care homes. Nursing Older People. 2006;17(10):22–34. MEDLINE

Benner, 1984. 3.Benner P. From Novice to Expert: Excellence and Power in Clinical Nursing. California: Addison Wesley; 1984;.

Billet, 2004. 4.Billet S. Workplace participatory practices: conceptualising workplaces as learning environments. The Journal of Workplace Learning. 2004;16(6):312–324.

Buckwater et al., 1993. 5.Buckwater K, Smith M, Martin M. Attitude problem. Nursing Times. 1993;89(3):55–60. MEDLINE

Burton, 2000. 6.Burton AJ. Reflection: nursing’s practice and education panacea. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2000;31(5):1009–1017. MEDLINE | CrossRef

Chilvers and Jones, 1997. 7.Chilvers JR, Jones D. The teaching nursing homes innovation: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1997;26(3):463–469. MEDLINE

Clifford, 1999. 8.Clifford C. The clinical role of the nurse teacher: a conceptual framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1999;30(1):179–185. MEDLINE | CrossRef

Davies and Nutley, 2000. 9.Davies H, Nutley S. Developing learning organisations in the new NHS. British Medical Journal. 2000;320(7240):998–1001.

Davies et al., 2002. 10.Davies S, Gell L, Tetley J, Aveyard B. Learning to nurse in care homes: student support. Nursing Standard. 2002;17(13–15):39–42. MEDLINE

Department of Health, 1999. 11.Department of Health, 1999. Making a Difference: Strengthening the Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting Contribution to Health Care. HMSO, London.

Department of Health, 2000. 12.Department of Health, 2000. The NHS Plan: A Plan for Reform. HMSO, London.

Dix and Hughes, 2004. 13.Dix G, Hughes S. Strategies to help students learn effectively. Nursing Standard. 2004;18(32):39–42. MEDLINE

Duffy et al., 2000. 14.Duffy K, Docherty C, Cardnuff L, White M, Winters G, Greig J. The nurse lecturer’s role in mentoring the mentors. Nursing Standard. 2000;15(6):35–38. MEDLINE

Duraghee, 1998. 15.Duraghee T. Facilitating reflection: from a sage on the stage to a guide on the side. Nurse Education Today. 1998;18:158–164. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (678 KB) | CrossRef

English National Board/DoH, 2001. 16.English National Board/DoH, 2001. Placements in Focus. ENB, London.

Fagerberg et al., 2000. 17.Fagerberg I, Winblad B, Ekman S. Influencing aspects in nursing education on Swedish nursing students’ choices of first work area as graduated nurses. Journal of Nursing Education. 2000;39(5):211–218. MEDLINE

Gallagher and Holland, 2004. 18.Gallagher A, Holland L. Work-based learning: challenges and opportunities. Nursing Standard. 2004;19(14):39–42. MEDLINE

Gerrish, 1992. 19.Gerrish K. The nurse teachers role in the practice setting. Nurse Education Today. 1992;12:227–232. MEDLINE | CrossRef

Griscti et al., 2005. 20.Griscti O, Jacono B, Jacono J. The nurse educator’s clinical role. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005;50(1):84–92. MEDLINE | CrossRef

Happell, 1999. 21.Happell B. When I grow up I want to be…? Where undergraduate nurses want to work after graduation. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1999;29(2):499–505. MEDLINE | CrossRef

Happell, 2002. 22.Happell B. Nursing home employment for student nurses: valuable experience or a harsh deterrent?. Journal of Advance Nursing. 2002;39(6):529–536.

Hutchings et al., 2005. 23.Hutchings A, Williamson G, Humphreys A. Supporting learners in clinical practice: capacity issues. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2005;14(8):945–955. MEDLINE | CrossRef

Koh, 2002. 24.Koh LC. Practice-based teaching and nurse education. Nursing Standard. 2002;1(19):38–42.

Kolb, 1984. 25.Kolb D. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1984;.

Kotzabassaki et al., 2006. 26.Kotzabassaki, S., Vardaki, Z., Andrea, S., Parissopoulis, S., 2006. Student nurses’ attitudes towards care of elderly persons. ICUS Nursing Web Journal 12. Available from: <http://www.nursing.gr/>.

Li, 2007. 27.Li, S., 2007. The role of simulation in nursing education: a regulatory perspective. In: Paper Presented at The AACN Hot Issues Conference, Denver Colorado, April 2007.

Lumley et al., 2000. 28.Lumley J, Calpin-Davies P, Mitchell K. Student experiences in nursing homes: a placement policy gap?. Nursing Older People. 2000;12(8):14–16. MEDLINE

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, 2005. 29.National Council of State Boards of Nursing, 2005. Clinical Instruction in Prelicensure Nursing. NCSBN, Chicago.

Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2004a. 30.Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2004a. Consultation on a Standard to Support Learning and Assessment in Practice. NMC, London.

Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2004b. 31.Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2004b. Council’s UK Standards and Frameworks for Quality Assurance of Education Programmes Leading to Registration or Recordable Qualification with Regard to Nursing, Midwifery and Specialist Community Public Health Nursing. NMC, London.

Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2004c. 32.Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2004c. Standards for the Preparation of Teachers of Nurses, Midwives and Specialist Community Public Health Nurses. NMC, London.

Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2007. 33.Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2007. Standards to Support Learning and Assessment in Practice. NMC, London.

Philipose et al., 1991. 34.Philipose V, Tate J, Jacobs S. Review of nursing literature – evolution of gerontological education in nursing. Nursing and Health Care. 1991;12(10):524–530. MEDLINE

Quinn, 2000. 35.Quinn FM. Principles and Practice of Nurse Education. fourth ed.. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes; 2000;.

Ramage, 2004. 36.Ramage C. Negotiating multiple roles: link teachers in clinical nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2004;45(3):287–296. MEDLINE | CrossRef

Richardson et al., 2001. 37.Richardson E, Humphries B, Fuggle K, Barber M, Shepherd P, Druce J. Student placements in the nursing home setting. Nursing Standard. 2001;16(13–15):39–44. MEDLINE

Rogan and Wyllie, 2003. 38.Rogan F, Wyllie A. Engaging undergraduate nursing students in the care of elderly residents in Australian nursing homes. Nurse Education in Practice. 2003;3:95–103.

Scanlan et al., 2002. 39.Scanlan JM, Care W, Udod S. Unravelling the unknowns of reflection in classroom teaching. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2002;38(2):136–143. MEDLINE | CrossRef

Schon, 1987. 40.Schon D. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Josey Bass; 1987;.

Storey and Adams, 2002. 41.Storey C, Adams J. Improving student placements in nursing homes. Nursing Older People. 2002;14(5):16–18. MEDLINE

United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing and Midwifery, 1999. 42.United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing and Midwifery, 1999. Fitness for Practice. UKCC, London.

Wade and Skinner, 2001. 43.Wade S, Skinner A. Student placement in nursing homes. Nursing Older People. 2001;13(2):14–17. MEDLINE

Williamson and Webb, 2001. 44.Williamson G, Webb C. Supporting students in practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2001;10(2):284–292. MEDLINE | CrossRef

Williams et al., 2006. 45.Williams KN, Nowak J, Scobee RL. Fostering student interest in geriatric nursing: impact of senior long-term experiences. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2006;27(4):190–193. MEDLINE

Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, Thames Valley University, Wellington Street, Slough, Berkshire SL1 1YG, United Kingdom

Corresponding Author InformationTel.: +44 01753 697899.

PII: S1471-5953(08)00024-3

doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2008.03.003


View previous. 5 of 9 View next.