Nurse Education in Practice
Volume 10, Issue 4 , Pages 227-232, July 2010

Application and student evaluation of a Clinical Progression Portfolio: A pilot

  • Marie Cooke

      Affiliations

    • Research Centre for Clinical and Community Practice Innovation, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 07 373 57985; fax: +61 07 373 55431.
  • ,
  • Marion Mitchell

      Affiliations

    • Research Centre for Clinical and Community Practice Innovation, Meadowbrook, QLD 4131, Australia
    • Tel.: +61 07 338 21225; fax: +61 07 338 21277.
  • ,
  • Wendy Moyle

      Affiliations

    • Research Centre for Clinical and Community Practice Innovation, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia
    • Tel.: +61 07 373 55526; fax: +61 07 373 55431.
  • ,
  • Amanda Henderson

      Affiliations

    • Nursing Practice Development Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital/Research Centre for Clinical and Community Practice Innovation, Australia
    • Tel.: +61 07 3240 2780; fax: +61 07 3240 7356.
  • ,
  • Jenny Murfield

      Affiliations

    • Research Centre for Clinical and Community Practice Innovation, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia
    • Tel.: +61 07 373 55273; fax: +61 07 373 57855.

Accepted 15 November 2009. published online 18 December 2009.

Summary 

Clinical practicums are often limited by a lack of meaningful communication between nursing students and registered nurses (RNs). This pilot study evaluated the utility of the Clinical Progression Portfolio (CPP) to enable students to learn how to initiate engagement with their RNs and to develop their capacity as students to learn. The study employed a descriptive survey design, with a convenience sample of second-year Bachelor of Nursing (BN) students in Brisbane, Australia. Questionnaires were completed by 129 students from 20 clinical practicum groups. Students who used the CPP were more favourable in their usefulness ratings (−rpb=0.531, p<0.001) and, furthermore, those that used the CPP most frequently were also more favourable (r=0.555, p<0.001). Students thought the CPP helped clarify learning and target appropriate practicum opportunities. When used, the CPP was an important part of practicum, used frequently and considered useful. The CPP format met the needs of students as it was pocket-sized. Overall, students reported that the CPP was a useful learning and communication tool as it provided them direction in how they might maximise opportunities to address their learning needs.

Keywords: Clinical nurse education, Student nurse, Learning partnerships, Registered nurse, Learning portfolio

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1471-5953(09)00178-4

doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2009.11.010

Nurse Education in Practice
Volume 10, Issue 4 , Pages 227-232, July 2010