Nurse Education in Practice
Volume 10, Issue 5 , Pages 268-273 , September 2010

Learning features in computer simulation skills training

  • Eva Johannesson

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +46 13228678.
  • ,
  • Mats Olsson

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden
  • ,
  • Göran Petersson

      Affiliations

    • eHealth Institute, School of Human Sciences, University of Kalmar, SE-392 30 Kalmar, Sweden
  • ,
  • Charlotte Silén

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Teaching and Learning, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institute, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden

,Accepted 15 November 2009.

References 

  1. Adams A. Pedagogical underpinnings of computer-based learning. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2004;46(1):5–12
  2. Alinier G, Hunt B, Gordon R, Harwood C. Effectiveness of intermediate fidelity simulation training technology in undergraduate nursing education. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2006;54(3):359–369
  3. Baillie L, Curzio J. Students’ and facilitators’ perceptions of simulation in practice learning. Nurse Education in Practice. 2009;9:297–306
  4. Barker VL. CathSim. Studies in Health Technology Inform. 1999;62:36–37
  5. Baxter P, Akhtar-Danesh N, Valaitis R, Stanyon W, Sproul S. Simulated experiences: nursing students share their perspectives. Nurse Education Today. 2009;
  6. Bergin R, Fors U. Interactive simulation of patients – an advanced tool for student-activated learning in medicine & healthcare. Computers and Education. 2003;40(4):361–376
  7. Bradley P, Postlethwaite K. Simulation in clinical learning. Medical Education. 2003;37(Suppl. 1):1–5
  8. Cioffi J, Purcal N, Arundell F. A pilot study to investigate the effect of a simulation strategy on the clinical decision making of midwifery students. Journal of Nursing Education. 2005;44(3):131–134
  9. Chauvet S, Hofmeyer A. Humor as a facilitative style in problem-based learning environments for nursing students. Nurse Education Today. 2007;27:286–292
  10. Clark MC. Off the beaten path: some creative approaches to adult learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. 2001;89:83–91
  11. du Boulay C, Medway C. The clinical skills resource. a review of current practice. Medical Education. 1999;33(3):185–191
  12. Flanagan B, Nestel D, Joseph M. Making patient safety the focus: crisis resource management in the undergraduate curriculum. Medical Education. 2004;38(1):56–66
  13. Forman D, Nyatanga L, Rich T. E-learning and educational diversity. Nurse Education Today. 2002;22:76–82
  14. Glavin RJ, Maran NJ. Integrating human factors into the medical curriculum. Medical Education. 2003;37(Suppl. 1):59–64
  15. Gordon JA, Wilkerson WM, Shaffer DW, Armstrong EG. “Practicing” medicine without risk: students’ and educators’ responses to high-fidelity patient simulation. Academic Medicine. 2001;76(5):469–472
  16. Hogg G, Pirie ES, Ker J. The use of simulated learning to promote safe blood transfusion. Nurse Education in Practice. 2006;6:214–223
  17. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Hart IR, Mayer JW, Felner JM, Petrusa ER, et al. Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA. 1999;282(9):861–866
  18. Issenberg SB, Pringle S, Harden RM, Khogali S, Gordon MS. Adoption and integration of simulation-based learning technologies into the curriculum of a UK undergraduate education programme. Medical Education. 2003;37(1):42–49
  19. Jeffries PR. Computer versus lecture: a comparison of two methods of teaching oral medication administration in a nursing skills laboratory. Journal of Nursing Education. 2001;40(7):323–329
  20. Jeffries PR. Guest editorial. Technology trends in nursing education: next steps. Journal of Nursing Education. 2005;44(1):3–4
  21. Jöud A, Sandholm A, Alseby L, Petersson G, Nilsson G. Feasibility of a computerized male urethral catheterization simulator. Nurse Education in Practice. 2010;10(2):70–75
  22. Ker JS. Developing professional clinical skills for practice – the results of a feasibility study using a reflective approach to intimate examination. Medical Education. 2003;37(Suppl. 11):34–41
  23. Kneebone R, Kidd J, Nestel D, Asvall S, Paraskeva P, Darzi A. An innovative model for teaching and learning clinical procedures. Medical Education. 2002;36(7):628–634
  24. Kneebone R. Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications. Medical Education. 2003;37:267–277
  25. Lehti S, Lehtinen E. Computer-supported problem-based learning in the research methodology domain. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2005;49(3):297–324
  26. Maran NJ, Glavin RJ. Low- to high-fidelity simulation–a continuum of medical education?. Medical education. 2003;37(s1):22–28
  27. Marton F, Booth S. Learning and Awareness. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1997;
  28. Matthews JC. Somatic knowing and education. Educational Forum. 1998;62(3):236–242
  29. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. Effect of practice on standardized learning outcomes in simulation-based medical education. Medical Education. 2006;40(8):792–797
  30. Merril GL, Barker VL. Virtual reality debuts in the teaching laboratory in nursing. Journal of Intravenous Nursing. 1996;19(4):182–187
  31. Murray C, Grant MJ, Howarth ML, Leigh J. The use of simulation as a teaching and learning approach to support practice learning. Nurse Education in Practice. 2008;8:5–8
  32. Reilly A, Spratt C. The perceptions of undergraduate student nurses of high-fidelity simulation-based learning: a case report from the University of Tasmania. Nurse Education Today. 2007;27:542–550
  33. Rystedt H, Lindström B. Introducing simulation technologies in nurse education: a nursing practice perspective. Nurse Education in Practice. 2001;1:134–141
  34. Schiavenato M. Reevaluating simulation in nursing education: beyond the human patient simulator. Journal of Nursing Education. 2009;48(7):388–394
  35. Schoening AM, Sittner BJ, Todd MJ. Simulated clinical experience: nursing students’ perceptions and the educators’ role. Nurse Educator. 2006;31:253–258
  36. Seropian MA, Brown K, Gavilanes JS, Driggers B. Simulation: not just a manikin. Journal of Nursing Education. 2004;43(4):164–169
  37. Seropian MA, Brown K, Gavilanes JS, Driggers B. An approach to simulation program development. Journal of Nursing Education. 2004;43(4):170–174
  38. Siegel S, Castellan NJ. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. second ed... McGraw-Hill Publisher; 1988;
  39. Silén C. Responsibility and independence in learning – what is the role of the educators and the framework of the educational programme?. In:  Rust C editors. Improving Student Learning: Improving Student Learning – Theory, Research and Practice. Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development; 2003;
  40. Walsh K. Simulators. British Medical Journal. 2005;330:1319
  41. Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S. Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Academic Medicine. 2003;78(8):783–788

PII: S1471-5953(09)00186-3

doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2009.11.018

Nurse Education in Practice
Volume 10, Issue 5 , Pages 268-273 , September 2010